Personal Response.

Matt McCabe

Mrs. McConkey

ENG3UE

Dec. 2, 2011

Before reading George Orwell's 1984, I already had a sense of the basic themes portrayed throughout the novel. I had read Animal Farm, another of Orwell's classics which is often related to 1984, I was aware of the situation the people of Oceania found themselves in, and I understood, for the most part, The Party and it's implications. Due to my prior knowledge and estimations I did not find the plot-line to be extremely riveting (it was somewhat ruined for me), however, I am very glad that I read the novel and am now in possession of the lessons it imparted, if not for any other reason than that I do believe to have gained a new sense of controlled paranoia, if you will.

During the time I was reading 1984 I was immersed within a twisted version of my own life, to a certain extent, forcing me to re-evaluate myself and the ways in which I am controlled by the modern day Big Brothers. I found myself reading simple posters and signs, wondering if on some unconscious level that the word-choice being used was somehow meddling with the way my thoughts processed the information. I felt a personal connection with Winston, as I'm certain anyone could, which made the real world and Oceania that much more intertwined. Through Orwell's bleak portrayal of totalitarianism I was exposed to a whole new range of "thoughtcrime" that I had not ever really given much thought to before. Is there any greater gift a novel can give than the ability to examine your own life through a different shade? I don't think so.

Due to my prior knowledge of the novel I do feel somewhat robbed of the full effect that I'm sure many people receive upon reading. However I was still affected by it, and while I did not gain the full aspect of the world created by George Orwell, I had tasted enough of it to be able to appreciate it for it's ultimate mastery.

Works Cited

Matt McCabe

Mrs. McConkey

ENG3UE

Dec. 2, 2011

At, YaWeeRandyBK. "1984 by George Orwell. Search EText, Read Online, Study, Discuss." The Literature Network: Online Classic Literature, Poems, and Quotes. Essays & Summaries. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. .

Johnson, Trevor. "What Makes a Novel a Classic and Who Says It Is in the First Place?" Ezinearticles.com. Web. 01 Dec. 2011. .

Keyes, Ralph. I Love It When You Talk Retro: Hoochie Coochie, Double Whammy, Drop a Dime, and the Forgotten Origins of American Speech. New York: St. Martin's, 2009. 222. Print.

"New Files." Interview by Evangelos Venizelos. Thebestfromgreece.com. Web. 01 Dec. 2011. .

Stated on Greek television show "New Files".

Orwell, George. 1984. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1984. Print.

Palmer, Scott. ""1984: An Interview with George Orwell"" Business Software Review Mar. 1984. Web. 1 Dec. 2011. .

Rance, Paul. "The Impact of 1984, by George Orwell on Society - by Paul Rance - Helium." Helium - Where Knowledge Rules. 23 Apr. 2010. Web. 03 Dec. 2011. .

Apologia.

Matt McCabe

Mrs. McConkey

ENG3UE

Dec. 2, 2011

There is much debate on the topic of what makes a novel classic. Some simply state that it needs to stand the test of time, "No matter whether the novel is universally liked" (Johnson, 2), whereas others are much more strict. However, I have chosen my own criteria for what I believe gives a novel the right to be compared to the works of the greatest novelists of all time: the piece must be relatable and relevant to various generations, it must contain some form of warning or message from which a lesson is learned, and it must have some aspect of historical significance or cultural impact. Through it's superior calibre of writing the novel will prove itself to outlast it's competition and to be well respected amongst literary circles. Based on the above criteria, I wholeheartedly believe that George Orwell's 1984 is a classic novel.

In an interview for Business Software Review during the year of 1984, Orwell gave the following statement: "I'm saddened, in a way, that my book is still read, because that means it's still politically relevant." (Orwell, Palmer.)"Although as ironic as it seems, it is true. 1984 is just as relevant in today's society as it was when it was originally published in 1949, directly after the end of World-War II. Orwell brought to life a dark vision of how our society's future could possibly have ended up in the coming years. How is it that such a dismal prediction of the "future" can still remain relevant today, years after the estimated time-frame? As a very involved political observer himself, Orwell had sought to utilise the basic horrors that he saw a totalitarian society would create if allowed to come to fruition. Through 1984, Orwell is commenting on social status, greed, power-lust and just how easily we as human beings can be controlled. Through brainwash, propaganda and corporal punishment "The Party" is able to abuse the people's fears against themselves in a way to create an in-balance of power between themselves and the government. So long as people are still afraid of being oppressed by their leaders, those horrors will never slight. By bringing these fears to the surface, Orwell exposes a whole arsenal of human insecurities and doubts that people of any generation would register within themselves and their lives. Through this, Orwell is able to make the novel relatable and completely relevant to nearly any audience, no matter the time period.

In the same way that within the novel "The Party" uses fears against their inmates, Orwell uses the fear of totalitarianism to issue a social warning in a way that is easily understood and felt by nearly anyone who might happen to read the novel. In short, Orwell is warning people to take note of the amount they are being subjugated by their "leaders"; to be aware of their rights as a human being and to be sure to utilise them to their fullest extent. "As interpreted by writer Paul Rance, "Big Brother is not someone to be worshipped. Hitler and Stalin gained power because people were slow to spot the danger, and there's Orwell's warning." (Rance, 5), you can see that there is a very real danger involved in totalitarianism; real danger which requires as real a warning to heed it's arrival. By shedding light onto the subject of giving complete governmental control over a group of people to a single mind-set, Orwell foretells the relatively quick downfall of a healthy society. From censorship to sexual repression, "The Party" controls literally every aspect of daily life and after reading 1984 it forces readers to re-evaluate their own lives and positions in society.

1984 has had an immense cultural impact on our world in many ways. Due to the emphasis Orwell put on the way language can be used to manipulate people, he created concepts within his novel, concepts which are now widely recognized and understood throughout the world; concepts such as Big Brother, memory holes, and doublethink have wormed their way into being considered as common phrases of the english language. In literature, media and virtually every instance possible, these terms wrought from Orwell's mind have taken on a much larger scale than originally intended. Greek politician Evangelos Venizelos recently stated "Our weakness is our strength"... a prime example of doublethink. As well as creating new terms, Orwell unintentionally created the suffix of "-speak" and the adjective birthed of his name; Orwellian. For a novel that based many of it's themes on the power of language, what greater form of twisted flattery is there than to adopt it's concepts into daily life? How could a novel that is not "a classic" have such a big impact on the world?

There is no doubt in my mind that George Orwell's 1984 is a classic novel. It has proved itself for over half a century now to not only be relevant and entertaining as well as thought provoking, but at the same time still easily understood. Combined with Orwell's excellent style of writing and characters, 1984 is unquestionably a titan amongst classic novels.

O'Brien Character Analysis

The character of O'Brien is a complex one. Originally discovered as another man opposed to the Party, him and Winston meet up and discuss The Brotherhood; an underground group of people working to overthrow the Party. However, soon enough O'Brien's true nature is revealed as a Party supporter when he takes both Julia and Winston to the Ministry of Love.

The original characteristic of O'Brien that attracts Winston to him is his charisma, he seems to have an underlying quality that people enjoy. However, under the surface there is a near fanatical urge for power and control; control over those who don't see the world the same way that he does. Knowing that Orwell wrote 1984 following WWII O'Brien's character seemed to me to be a reflection of Orwell's view of Adolf Hitler, almost as much so as Big Brother seemed to be based upon Joseph Stalin. Both Hitler and O'Brien seem to be blinded by the prospect of power to the point of inhumanity; a feature discovered to be greatly admired by the Party.

O'Brien is the perfect agent of the Party. The torture and pain that O'Brien inflicts upon Winston is a direct reflection of the Party's views against a free-thinking individual. The fact that he declares that he "could float off the floor like a soap bubble"(569) by using levitation is an example of doublethink; the Party's favorite form of brainwash. He has the ability to hold two contrasting ideas within his mind at the same time and still believe them both to be true. He can read the Party's slogan "War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength" and wholeheartedly agree with it.

O'Brien is revealed to be a firm believer and user of doublethink; the ability to have two contrasting ideas in one's head and still believe them both to be true, something greatly cherished by the Party.

Being the physical manifestation of the entire Party's beliefs, when Winston argues the fact that humanity is real and that man holds a natural set of rights, O'Brien shut him down. He claims that the human spirit is non-existant, and in so, reveals the true nature of the party; to crush man until it is no longer capable of thoughts and feelings. Dehumanization. By supporting the Party O'Brien is stating that he believes that all humans should act as machines, but in doing so he is contradicting his very beliefs that no man should think for himself. Doublethink in a nutshell.

The Symbolism of The Glass Paperweight and St. Clements Church

Through the use of intense propaganda the Party forces their version of the past, and in turn their vision of truth itself, to manifest within individual minds. While controlling the present the Party are able to make it almost impossible to deny the fact that they might not have controlled the entire past as well. Throughout the novel Winston attempts to see through the haze of lies in his mind to recover his own personal memories, memories of before the Party's reign. This constant interior battle within himself soon comes to be represented in a small, glass paperweight he bought in an antique store in one of his visits to the prole district. The paperweight, clear with a pink coral interior, is one of the last remaining "chunks of history" the Party had "forgotten to alter" (319). Winston sees it as a direct spyglass to the past, a window free of the Party's influence. It is his anchor to the world before the Party, with it he is certain of the lies being spread. However, when his and Julia's room above Mr. Charrington's shop is raided by the Thought Police it is destroyed; a textbook example of foreshadowing.

The raid by the Thought Police also brings about another bout of foreshadowing; the police discover Winston and Julia from hidden the telescreen behind the painting of the St. Clements Church. Periodically, Winston had been remembering a phrase or two from an old song from his childhood, based upon the St. Clements Church. Up until this point in the novel the song, much like the paperweight, had been a symbol of hope for Winston. It also formed a direct link to a better time. However, as the police ultimately use it to destroy him, a dark shadow is cast upon it.

The paperweight shattering and the song being dirtied by the likes of the Thought Police could both be seen as direct symbolic foreshadowing of the suffering Winston and Julia alike were about to undergo. Before shattering their entire belief systems, the Party, unknowingly or not, shatter the only physical ties to the previous world that Winston could remember. Without them, Winston was left with just his fleeting memories, memories that proved able to be broken with about the same effort involved needed for smashing a glass sphere. "Here comes the chopper to chop off your head"...

Are we Proles?

One of the most interesting aspects of George Orwell's 1984 in my opinion is the role of the Proles, the everyday people at the bottom of the social class as depicted in the image below:

Spearheading the camaraderie, if I may use the term popularized by the figure head himself, is Big Brother. As the leader of the entire society, Big Brother is at the top of the social food-chain; a single figure running the lives of what is assumed to be hundreds of thousands of other people. Next up is the Inner and Outer Party, the rewarded servants of Big Brother who spend day in and day out carrying out his every command. Then, there are the Proles, the vast majority of the population. Why are they significant to Oceania's society?

Functioning as a single character, the Proles are extremely under-developed. Not once is a Prole singled out as an individual with thoughts or goals, they are an unacknowledged, mindless mass in the grand scheme of things. If this is so, however, why is it that Winston has such a livid envy for them? Why is it that they are seen as "The only free human beings" by Winston?

The answer would be subjective to the reader. As ignorant, ill-educated workers, the Proles are left in the dark about much of the secrecy and sinister activity around them; they know little of the horrors committed daily by their social superiors and they are only concerned with their very, very small world. However, ignorance truly is bliss as it seems because the Proles are happy; something Winston strives for. Being a member of the Outer-Party himself, Winston is subjected to intense scrutiny and constant stress. He is always being watched, always being judged, and most importantly, always being forced to pretend to be someone he's not. He envies the Proles because he sees them as holding the real power, and as he states "If there was hope, it lay in the proles. You had to cling on to that." (108).

How is it that ignorant, primitive, lowly beings can invoke hope in a member of the top 15% of the entire society? Simple. With large numbers lies safety as well as power. Without living in constant fear of being vaporized, the proles are allowed to feel happy and free, and with a little motivation, the proles could easily over-come their oppressive government in one massive organized surge. However, as Winston explains, they just don't know how. They are brain-washed into believing in their own freedom, they have absolutely no idea just how controlled their environment is. They have no idea of the strings tying them to the puppeteer that is Big Brother, and as a result, have no desire what so ever of an insurgence.

As a member of the social majority of our population today, this particular situation struck a chord deep within myself. Who's to say that we are not living in a prole-like society today, completely unaware of the atrocities committed around us everyday? Who's to say that our lives aren't being oppressed by our mental superiors right now? Am I living the pointless life of a prole? Are you? And if so, I wonder if it is time for our collective intelligence to strike against out against our oppressors - whoever they might be.

Winston Smith: Character Analysis

The protagonist of 1984 is Winston Smith. Winston is the character that I found easiest to relate to, and i'm sure most people would. It is through Winston's point of view that the reader peers at the world created by Orwell, and it is through the character development of Winston that Orwell conveys his fears and warnings about a totalitarian society.

Right from the start Winston is portrayed as a seemingly ordinary man out of place in an extraordinary world. Even the contrast in his identity, his first and last name, provide a sense of duality; the commonplace surname Smith versus the implied heroicity of the name Winston, a name forever cemented to Churchill. As a reader I could not help but to identify parts of myself within him, he is ordinary in almost every sense of the word, yet he finds the courage and strength to attempt to improve his circumstances. He is the underdog struggling against the favored champion; the David to Big Brother's Goliath.

In a world where simply writing in a diary is reason for an execution, Winston's life is a miserable one excluding a brief interval of happiness and love in which the reader, as well as the character, are infused with a sense of hope for the end. However, Orwell makes certain that the false hope is soon diminished as such a society could not permit a happy ending. Winston is a representation of the emotions of human beings as a whole, and in order for Orwell's true vision of a totalitarian society to be portrayed Winston must be defeated; representing the defeat every person who had identified with him would most certainly face if such a society were ever allowed to come to fruition.

Winston's spirit and humanitarianism are in the end broken, the two characteristics of himself in which he fought the hardest to keep. By using such an identifiable character Orwell is insisting that Winston's fate could occur to anyone, the very reason the author must break his protagonist. Through Winston Smith's destruction comes the realization and explicit warning that none may survive a society like that in 1984, Orwell's intended communiqué.